Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291726›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2026

Co-Contraction Training Induces Muscle Hypertrophy but Not Strength Gains in Older Adults: A Controlled Intervention Study.

Marina Mello Villalba, Rafael Akira Fujita, Julia Oliveira de Faria, Veronica Miyasike-daSilva, Renato Moraes, Matheus Machado Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marina Mello VillalbaRibeirão Preto College of Nursing University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7752-7431
Rafael Akira FujitaSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's Newfoundland and Labrador Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0865-8857
Julia Oliveira de FariaFaculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-4945
Veronica Miyasike-daSilvaFaculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9669-8930
Renato MoraesFaculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8029-8334
Matheus Machado GomesRibeirão Preto College of Nursing University of São Paulo Ribeirão Preto Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-5699

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aging is associated with neuromuscular decline, impairing function and independence. Resistance training mitigates these effects; however, in some contexts, barriers such as access to facilities, transportation, and adherence may limit participation, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged and community-dwelling older adults. Maximal voluntary co-contraction resistance training has emerged as a low-cost, equipment-free alternative; however, its effectiveness compared to traditional resistance training remains unclear. Objective: To compare the effects of an 8-week co-contraction resistance training program with traditional resistance training and a control group on functional capacity, strength, and muscle morphology in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: Thirty-four physically active older adults (60-85 years) were randomized into co-contraction ( Results: The traditional group improved knee extensor strength ( Conclusion: Co-contraction resistance training appears feasible and induced muscle hypertrophy in older adults, but without corresponding strength gains. These findings suggest it may be a viable option in contexts where access to resistance machines is limited. Nevertheless, further research is needed to confirm efficacy and define optimal program parameters (frequency and volume) for effective implementation in this population.

Indexed as

agingmuscle strengthmuscle thicknessphysical functionstrength training

Identifiers

PMID42291726
PMCPMC13259961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.