ArticleHealth science reports2026
Co-Contraction Training Induces Muscle Hypertrophy but Not Strength Gains in Older Adults: A Controlled Intervention Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aging is associated with neuromuscular decline, impairing function and independence. Resistance training mitigates these effects; however, in some contexts, barriers such as access to facilities, transportation, and adherence may limit participation, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged and community-dwelling older adults. Maximal voluntary co-contraction resistance training has emerged as a low-cost, equipment-free alternative; however, its effectiveness compared to traditional resistance training remains unclear. Objective: To compare the effects of an 8-week co-contraction resistance training program with traditional resistance training and a control group on functional capacity, strength, and muscle morphology in community-dwelling older adults. Methods: Thirty-four physically active older adults (60-85 years) were randomized into co-contraction ( Results: The traditional group improved knee extensor strength ( Conclusion: Co-contraction resistance training appears feasible and induced muscle hypertrophy in older adults, but without corresponding strength gains. These findings suggest it may be a viable option in contexts where access to resistance machines is limited. Nevertheless, further research is needed to confirm efficacy and define optimal program parameters (frequency and volume) for effective implementation in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.