Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Quality as an organizational strategy: building a system of improvement.

David M Williams, Clifford L Norman, Lloyd P Provost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David M WilliamsDMW Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Clifford L NormanAssociates in Process Improvement, Austin, TX, United States.
Lloyd P ProvostAssociates in Process Improvement, Austin, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improvement science offers proven theories and methods that can be applied to specific projects, but they have rarely been applied to the leadership systems of healthcare organizations. This paper presents Quality as an Organizational Strategy (QOS), a method for building a system of improvement that embeds improvement science into leadership and strategy. QOS centers on five activities: defining and communicating purpose, viewing the organization as a system, building a system for obtaining information, planning to improve, and managing improvement efforts. Examples from healthcare settings illustrate how leaders use these activities to align vision, strategy, and culture while fostering continuous learning. QOS is designed to enable organizations to pursue achieving strategic aims and sustaining performance over time. By broadening project-based improvement to improving the organizations as a system, this paper expands the application of improvement science with a practical, generalizable approach for transforming complex health systems.

Indexed as

healthcareimprovement scienceleadershiporganizational learningquality improvementquality strategysystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID42291691
PMCPMC13260625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.