ReviewAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Prevalence and Correlates of Test Anxiety Among Medical Students: Systematic Review.
Review in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Test anxiety is common among medical students, impacting their performance, well-being, and growth. While interest is rising, evidence on its prevalence and factors remains scattered. Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize recent evidence on the prevalence of test anxiety and identify psychological, academic, and demographic correlates among undergraduate medical students. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, EBSCOhost, and PsycINFO, were searched for studies published between January 2019 and July 2025. Eligible studies included cross-sectional research involving undergraduate medical students and using validated instruments to measure test anxiety. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A narrative synthesis was performed due to methodological heterogeneity across studies. Results: Thirteen cross-sectional studies from diverse geographic regions, including India, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Germany, Bangladesh, and China, were included. Sample sizes ranged from 82 to 735 participants. The prevalence of moderate to high test anxiety ranged from 13.5% to 72%. Higher anxiety levels were consistently associated with female gender, early academic years, academic workload, poor coping strategies, and limited social support. Psychological correlates included emotional distress, low self-efficacy, maladaptive coping, and burnout, while academic factors included examination format, heavy curriculum demands, and poor academic performance. Considerable heterogeneity in measurement tools and study settings limited quantitative synthesis. Conclusion: Test anxiety is common among medical students worldwide, influenced by psychological, academic, and demographic factors. Early detection and targeted support, Effective study strategies, and stress management can enhance well-being and academic success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.