ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Gaps in awareness and clinical practices regarding GERD among healthcare physicians in Pakistan.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the knowledge, understanding, clinical practices, and challenges of physicians in Pakistan concerning Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and to identify areas for improvement to enhance patient outcomes. Methodology: This cross-sectional survey was conducted among 435 physicians across Pakistan, including general practitioners, gastroenterologists, and internal medicine specialists. A structured, self-administered questionnaire collected data on demographics, knowledge of GERD risk factors and symptoms, diagnostic practices, management approaches, and perceived challenges. Results: Among 435 surveyed physicians, 80.2% reported being very familiar with GERD diagnosis and management, yet there were notable gaps in recognizing atypical and extra-esophageal symptoms. While acid regurgitation (91.5%) and heartburn (82.8%) were the most commonly recognized symptoms, less frequent acknowledgment was found for dysphagia (42.8%), cough (47.6%), and sore throat (37.7%). Only 14.0% of respondents consistently considered extra-esophageal symptoms in the context of GERD. Additionally, risk factors such as diet (82.3%), obesity (78.9%), and smoking (77.5%) were widely recognized, but challenges like poor treatment adherence (73.1%) and medication costs (46.0%) were reported. A majority of respondents requested more training (61.8%) and availability of updated national guidelines (57.2%). These findings highlight gaps in symptom recognition and the need for enhanced education and research to improve GERD diagnosis and management practices. Conclusion: While most physicians demonstrated adequate knowledge of GERD, significant gaps in recognizing atypical symptoms, utilization of advanced diagnostics, and addressing management challenges were noted. Tailored interventions, including updated national GERD guidelines, focused training programs, and enhanced access to diagnostic and management tools, are essential to improving care quality and patient outcomes in Pakistan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.