Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Heterogeneous benefit of early sacubitril/valsartan initiation after PCI in elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction: myocardial recovery and mid-term cardiovascular outcomes.

Jian Li, Chunxia Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jian LiWuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.
Chunxia TangWuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of sacubitril/valsartan initiation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction remains unclear. This study evaluated whether very early initiation was associated with better myocardial recovery and clinical outcomes than delayed initiation or no sacubitril/valsartan. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction after successful PCI were classified into three groups according to treatment timing: early initiation (≤7 days), delayed initiation (14-28 days), and no sacubitril/valsartan. After 1:1:1 propensity score matching, 360 patients were included. Echocardiographic recovery and biomarker changes were assessed at 8 weeks, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were evaluated over 12 months using competing-risk analysis. Results: In the matched cohort, the early initiation group showed the greatest improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac index, together with the largest reductions in left ventricular dimensions at 8 weeks. Early initiation was also associated with more favorable declines in inflammatory and cardiac injury biomarkers, including hs-CRP and NT-proBNP. During 12-month follow-up, MACE occurred in 8.3% of the early group, 20.8% of the delayed group, and 25.0% of the control group. In Fine-Gray models, early initiation was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE than delayed initiation and no sacubitril/valsartan. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested stronger associations in patients aged ≥75 years and those with baseline LVEF ≤40%. Safety outcomes were comparable across groups. Conclusions: In this propensity score-matched retrospective analysis of elderly patients with left ventricular dysfunction after PCI, initiation of sacubitril/valsartan within 7 days was associated with more favorable short-term myocardial recovery profiles and a lower 12-month cardiovascular risk compared with delayed initiation or no ARNI therapy. However, residual confounding and potential immortal time bias cannot be excluded. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest a potential association that merits evaluation in prospective, randomized studies designed to compare different treatment timing strategies.

Indexed as

elderly patientsleft ventricular dysfunctionmajor adverse cardiovascular eventsmyocardial recoverypercutaneous coronary interventionsacubitril/valsartan

Identifiers

PMID42291548
PMCPMC13260289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.