ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Heart girth-based bodyweight prediction for Sub-Saharan African ruminants: updated equations by species, breed, and system.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of bodyweight (BW) from measurable animal characteristics serves many practical purposes for livestock farmers in sub-Saharan Africa, where weighing scales are impractical or infeasible. A volume of literature is devoted to BW estimation using heart girth (HG) (circumference of chest diameter behind front legs) as a main predictor; most published equations apply to animals of specific breeds, ages, or production systems, limiting applicability to livestock populations broadly. Using a large and diverse repeated measurement sample of African bovines (n = 5549; 13,165 measurements) and caprinae (n = 1857; 5707 measurements) we developed prediction equations specific to species, geography, and production system by segmenting regression formulae at the 50th percentile of HG, leading to two segments applicable to growing (bottom 50th) and mature (upper 50th) animals respectively. At the extremes of HG, segmented regression had superior predictive accuracy for bovines in particular, with as much as a 32% reduction in normalized RMSE (nRMSE) relative to unsegmented. This study thus: (i) provides the most comprehensive, genetically and geographically rigorous set of BW prediction equations for African domestic ruminants to-date based on a single predictor (heart girth), and (ii) for bovines, using segmented regression, prediction formulae robust to extremities of BW/HG, yielding comparable or improved prediction accuracy (nRMSE 6-13%) over existing formulae with equal or greater input requirements. As Box-Cox formulae were most accurate but structurally complex, authors propose formula transformations embedded directly on weigh-tapes or charts, maximizing ease-of-use and enabling scalable, low-cost, and accurate BW estimation for African production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.