ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026
Evaluation of two point-of-care molecular diagnostic platforms for rapid detection of equine Hendra virus.
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hendra virus (HeV) is a lethal zoonotic pathogen endemic to eastern Australia, posing significant risks to equine and human health. Rapid field detection of HeV enables timely intervention and outbreak management. This study evaluated candidate point-of-care (POC) molecular diagnostic platforms for HeV detection in equine samples: including a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (DARQ RT-LAMP) assay and real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Comparative analytical evaluation demonstrated that RT-qPCR exhibited superior analytical sensitivity relative to DARQ RT-LAMP, with a limit of detection of 1 copy/µL compared with 1,000 copies/µL, respectively. On this basis, DARQ RT-LAMP was not progressed beyond initial analytical evaluation due to insufficient sensitivity for the intended application. Bayesian Latent Class Model (BLCM) analysis estimated diagnostic sensitivity of 63.1% (95%PI 48.8-76.1%) and 80.4% (95%PI 67.6-90.2%) for RT-qPCR with HUDSON-prepared samples and extracted RNA, respectively, with identical specificity of 96.5% (95%PI 85.9-99.9%) for both sample types in virus transport medium. In 10% EDTA blood, diagnostic sensitivity was 71.3% (95%PI 54.2-85.1%) and 88.3% (95%PI 74.2-97.3%), respectively, with comparable specificity. Preliminary assessment of repeatability and reproducibility was promising (CVs <10%), although further field studies are required. These findings demonstrate that RT-qPCR, combined with rapid HUDSON sample preparation, provides a feasible molecular POC approach for preliminary rule-in or exclusion of HeV infection in horses while confirmatory laboratory testing is pending, supporting early risk management and reduced occupational exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.