Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291516›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

Evaluation of two point-of-care molecular diagnostic platforms for rapid detection of equine Hendra virus.

Lyndal Hulse, Leonard Izzard, Singanallur Balasubramanian Nagendrakumar, Axel Colling, Darren Underwood, Luke Driver, David T Williams, Benjamin Ahern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lyndal HulseSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton QLD 4343, Australia.
Leonard IzzardCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong VIC 3220, Australia.
Singanallur Balasubramanian NagendrakumarCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong VIC 3220, Australia.
Axel CollingCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong VIC 3220, Australia.
Darren UnderwoodBiosecurity Sciences Laboratory, Department of Primary Industries, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia.
Luke DriverBiosecurity Sciences Laboratory, Department of Primary Industries, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia.
David T WilliamsCSIRO, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong VIC 3220, Australia.
Benjamin AhernSchool of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton QLD 4343, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hendra virus (HeV) is a lethal zoonotic pathogen endemic to eastern Australia, posing significant risks to equine and human health. Rapid field detection of HeV enables timely intervention and outbreak management. This study evaluated candidate point-of-care (POC) molecular diagnostic platforms for HeV detection in equine samples: including a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (DARQ RT-LAMP) assay and real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Comparative analytical evaluation demonstrated that RT-qPCR exhibited superior analytical sensitivity relative to DARQ RT-LAMP, with a limit of detection of 1 copy/µL compared with 1,000 copies/µL, respectively. On this basis, DARQ RT-LAMP was not progressed beyond initial analytical evaluation due to insufficient sensitivity for the intended application. Bayesian Latent Class Model (BLCM) analysis estimated diagnostic sensitivity of 63.1% (95%PI 48.8-76.1%) and 80.4% (95%PI 67.6-90.2%) for RT-qPCR with HUDSON-prepared samples and extracted RNA, respectively, with identical specificity of 96.5% (95%PI 85.9-99.9%) for both sample types in virus transport medium. In 10% EDTA blood, diagnostic sensitivity was 71.3% (95%PI 54.2-85.1%) and 88.3% (95%PI 74.2-97.3%), respectively, with comparable specificity. Preliminary assessment of repeatability and reproducibility was promising (CVs <10%), although further field studies are required. These findings demonstrate that RT-qPCR, combined with rapid HUDSON sample preparation, provides a feasible molecular POC approach for preliminary rule-in or exclusion of HeV infection in horses while confirmatory laboratory testing is pending, supporting early risk management and reduced occupational exposure.

Indexed as

Hendra virusHenipavirusHorsesPoint-of-care-testValidation

Identifiers

PMID42291516
PMCPMC13253132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.