ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2026
Pulmonary vasodilator therapy in COPD-associated pulmonary hypertension: A real-world case series of 14 patients confirmed by right heart catheterization.
Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale: Pulmonary vasodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (COPD-PH) remains controversial, and real-world data describing which patients are selected for treatment after invasive hemodynamic confirmation are limited. We present a single-center case series of patients with RHC-confirmed COPD-PH treated with pulmonary vasodilators, focusing on clinical phenotype, hemodynamic profile, treatment patterns, and short-term outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case series of adults with COPD-associated PH identified by right heart catheterization (RHC) between 2018 and 2023. Patients with isolated precapillary PH or combined pre- and postcapillary PH treated with pulmonary vasodilators within 1 month of RHC were included. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and pulmonary complications. Results: Among 200 patients with COPD-PH and a precapillary component, 14 patients (7%) received pulmonary vasodilator therapy after RHC and comprised the case series. Most had isolated precapillary PH (71%), severe PH by prior criteria (71%), and frequent cardiopulmonary comorbidities. Sildenafil monotherapy was used in 13/14 patients, while one received sildenafil plus macitentan. At 1-year follow-up, 5/13 patients with available data developed MACE, including 3 heart failure hospitalizations and 2 cardiovascular deaths. Among 4 patients with repeat RHC, 3 had higher PVR on follow-up evaluation. Conclusion: Pulmonary vasodilator therapy was used in a small, highly selected subset of patients with RHC-confirmed COPD-PH. Treated patients had heterogeneous hemodynamic profiles and frequent cardiovascular events during follow-up, supporting the need for careful phenotyping and prospective studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.