Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291480›Full record

ArticleHealth care transitions2026

The impact of a patient navigator on readiness assessment scores in youth transitioning to adult health care in Alberta.

Megan Patton, Cassandra Chisholm, Zoya Punjwani, Andrew S Mackie, Scott Patten, Daniella San-Martin Feeney, Samantha J Anthony, Gina Dimitropoulos, Susan Samuel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care transitions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Megan PattonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Cassandra ChisholmDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Zoya PunjwaniDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Andrew S MackieDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Scott PattenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Daniella San-Martin FeeneyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Samantha J AnthonyChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Gina DimitropoulosDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Susan SamuelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: At ages 16-21, youth with chronic medical conditions transition from pediatric to adult specialty care and often feel unprepared. Transition readiness assessments, including the validated Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire (TRAQ), may guide preparation; however, longitudinal evaluation is needed to determine their utility in supporting successful transitions. Objective: (1) To compare changes in TRAQ scores between baseline, 12, and 24 months among individuals enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT); and (2) to highlight insights from youth with lived expertise transitioning to adult healthcare. Methods: This sub-study of the Transition Navigator Trial, a pragmatic RCT evaluating a patient navigator intervention, examined overall TRAQ scores among 129 participants. Group comparisons used the Mann-Whitney U test, and mixed models with random intercepts assessed associations between navigator access, time, and TRAQ scores. Fifteen youth partners with lived experience contributed perspectives through ongoing meetings and structured reflection on study findings; this involvement constitutes patient-oriented research and should not be interpreted as formal qualitative methodology. Results: At baseline, mean TRAQ scores did not differ significantly between intervention and control groups (β=0.05, p = 0.58, 95% CI -0.12, 0.22). Regardless of treatment allocation, mean TRAQ scores increased from baseline to 12 months (β=0.54, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.44, 0.63) and from baseline to 24 months (β=0.68, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.59, 0.78). Conclusions: Access to a patient navigator did not significantly influence TRAQ score trajectories; however, TRAQ scores increased significantly over time in both groups. These findings suggest that transition readiness, as measured by the TRAQ, may improve through lived experience during the transition period regardless of navigator access. Both groups received shared transition-related resources throughout the study, which may have contributed to the observed increases. Notably, the TRAQ was implemented as an indirect parallel measure in this study rather than a primary intervention target, and this should be considered when interpreting the null between-group finding. Partnering with youth enhanced interpretation of findings and underscored the importance of centering lived expertise when evaluating transition readiness outcomes.

Indexed as

Chronic health conditionPatient-centered careTransition readinessTransition to adult careYoung adult

Identifiers

PMID42291480
PMCPMC13254931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.