ArticlePeerJ2026
Detection of enteric viruses in source and treated waters of the city of Hamadan, Iran.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enteric viruses are waterborne pathogens of public health concern. This study uses five different detection methods to investigate the prevalence of viral pathogens in source and treated waters of the city of Hamadan, Iran. The dataset contributes to the body of knowledge on viral occurrence from a region with limited data on enteric viruses in waters. During the summer and autumn, a total of 100 water samples were collected, including 29 from source, 24 from treated waters from two drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs), and 47 from the supply network of groundwater wells in the city of Hamadan, Iran. For each sample, five liters of water samples were collected, concentrated, and analyzed by molecular methods for the detection of enteric viruses. Samples were analyzed using two standard and three multiplex PCR methods for the detection of enteric viruses. Adenoviruses were detected in 24% of the samples, with a significant difference in positivity rates between the sites (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.