Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291434›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

From evaluation to discharge: a cross-sectional study of therapist satisfaction with session duration in outpatient physical therapy.

Saad A Alhammad, Omar Khalid Almuhanna, Muteb Safar Aldosari, Abdulaziz Riyadh Aljumaah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saad A AlhammadDepartment of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Omar Khalid AlmuhannaDepartment of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0004-4892-1092
Muteb Safar AldosariDepartment of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0008-9878-016X
Abdulaziz Riyadh AljumaahDepartment of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Physical therapy (PT) session duration influences satisfaction, therapeutic effectiveness, and workload. Although prior studies examined satisfaction and outcomes, limited research has described how session duration is structured across phases of outpatient care. In Saudi Arabia, where rehabilitation services are expanding, no standard guidance exists for outpatient session length. This study explored current durations of evaluation, follow-up, and discharge sessions in outpatient PT across diverse patient populations, and examined therapists' satisfaction and perspectives on adequacy and optimal duration. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to PTs practicing in outpatient and homecare settings across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire collected demographic data, current session durations, satisfaction levels, and preferences for more or less time. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations examined variation by session type, patient population, daily caseload, and overbooking. Results: A total of 434 PTs participated. The most commonly reported durations were 30-40 and 15-25 min for evaluation (36%, 35%), follow-up (45%, 25%), and discharge sessions (39%, 33%). Duration varied by patient population; for example, 45-55-min evaluation sessions were reported by 41% of pediatric therapists Discussion: This study provides the first national description of outpatient PT session duration and therapist satisfaction in Saudi Arabia. Preferences were shaped by clinical context, caseload, and scheduling practices. Within its descriptive scope, these distributions may serve as practical scheduling benchmarks, informing default duration ranges by visit phase and patient population and guiding review of overbooking and caseload targets while supporting future research on clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CarePatient DischargePhysical TherapistsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsHealthcare policiesOutpatient clinicsPhysical therapySatisfactionSaudi ArabiaSchedules and appointmentsSession duration

Identifiers

PMID42291434
PMCPMC13256120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.