ArticlePeerJ2026
From evaluation to discharge: a cross-sectional study of therapist satisfaction with session duration in outpatient physical therapy.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Physical therapy (PT) session duration influences satisfaction, therapeutic effectiveness, and workload. Although prior studies examined satisfaction and outcomes, limited research has described how session duration is structured across phases of outpatient care. In Saudi Arabia, where rehabilitation services are expanding, no standard guidance exists for outpatient session length. This study explored current durations of evaluation, follow-up, and discharge sessions in outpatient PT across diverse patient populations, and examined therapists' satisfaction and perspectives on adequacy and optimal duration. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to PTs practicing in outpatient and homecare settings across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire collected demographic data, current session durations, satisfaction levels, and preferences for more or less time. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations examined variation by session type, patient population, daily caseload, and overbooking. Results: A total of 434 PTs participated. The most commonly reported durations were 30-40 and 15-25 min for evaluation (36%, 35%), follow-up (45%, 25%), and discharge sessions (39%, 33%). Duration varied by patient population; for example, 45-55-min evaluation sessions were reported by 41% of pediatric therapists Discussion: This study provides the first national description of outpatient PT session duration and therapist satisfaction in Saudi Arabia. Preferences were shaped by clinical context, caseload, and scheduling practices. Within its descriptive scope, these distributions may serve as practical scheduling benchmarks, informing default duration ranges by visit phase and patient population and guiding review of overbooking and caseload targets while supporting future research on clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.