SynthesisPeerJ2026
Association between smartphone addiction, suicidal ideation and suicide attempt: a systematic review.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smartphone addiction has been linked to adverse mental health outcomes, but its association with suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempt (SA) remains inconclusive. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the relationship between smartphone addiction and SI/SA. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from 1971 to August 2025 for peer-reviewed English-language studies examining smartphone addiction and SI or SA. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Eleven cross-sectional studies met inclusion criteria. Nine studies were conducted in South Korea, one in China, and one in the United States. Most studies (7/11) were high quality. Significant positive associations between smartphone addiction and SI were consistently reported across adolescents, college students, and young adults. A dose-response relationship was observed, with high-risk users showing greater SI odds (OR range: 1.14-4.57). For SA, significant associations were also evident in high-risk groups (OR range: 1.15-1.87). The relationship was moderated by synergistic factors such as stress and usage duration. Conclusion: Smartphone addiction is significantly associated with increased odds of SI and SA across different populations. The relationship mostly exhibits a dose-response pattern, with higher addiction severity correlating with increased odds. These findings support considering problematic smartphone use in suicide prevention strategies across age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.