ArticlePeerJ2026
The effect of impact location, velocity, and frequency on head injury criterion during ice hockey helmet drop tests.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study investigated whether differences in ice hockey helmet protection performance at varying impact velocities influence head injury risk. Methods: Linear acceleration data were recorded during drop tests on 24 ice hockey helmets by using a uniaxial accelerometer in a collision test machine under low- and ambient-temperature environments for sequential low-, medium-, and high-velocity impacts. Head injury criterion (HIC), seasonal injury risk (SIR) under different impact velocities, and total seasonal injury risk (TSIR) were calculated for each helmet location. Results: In both temperature environments, the back, front, and side locations produced higher TSIR than the top. Under low-velocity impacts, the side location produced higher SIR and HIC than the back and front. Under medium- and high-velocity impacts, the side location produced lower SIR than the back and front, or showed no difference compared to the back. Except for comparisons between the side and back/front under low-velocity impacts, SIR and HIC differences across locations were inconsistent or nonsignificant. Conclusion: These findings suggest that under low-velocity impacts, the higher HIC at the side location may be a key factor influencing head injury risk. To enhance helmet protective performance, optimizing energy absorption at the side location during low-velocity impacts is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.