ArticlePeerJ2026
Time-based V-slope for determination of anaerobic threshold.
Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The standard method for determining the noninvasive anaerobic threshold (AT) is the V-slope (VS) method. It is often supplemented by the ventilatory equivalent (VEQ) and end-tidal (ET) methods. However, a comparison issue arises: VS plots VCO Methods: V-slope is drawn as a square with equal sides, with the diagonal line representing the respiratory exchange ratio (R) = 1. V-slope generally follows the R = 1 line. This provides a framework in which the vertical difference (d) between a VCO Results: The mean AT (mL/min) and detection rates for d, VS, VEQ, and ET were 857 ± 414 (93%), 939 ± 407 (96%), 946 ± 176 (82%), and 862 ± 379 (85%), respectively. The d method identified AT significantly earlier than the conventional VS did ( Conclusions: The time-based V-slope was created by plotting changes in VCO2 from the R = 1 diagonal line against time; it aligned all three AT detecting methods on the same time axis, allowing precise detection of differences between methods. It also made AT detection more reliable, probably because the upward inflection breakpoint arises from the flat baseline and does not have the overlapping data points seen in V-slope, making it easier to identify a breakpoint. The d graph also identified AT significantly earlier than V-slope did.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.