Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291411›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Time-based V-slope for determination of anaerobic threshold.

Hirotaka Nishijima, Kazuyuki Kominami, Toko Katsuragawa, Masatoshi Akino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hirotaka NishijimaDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Aisin Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuyuki KominamiDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Aisin Memorial Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Toko KatsuragawaDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiac Rehaboilitation, Kitano Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masatoshi AkinoDepartment of Cardiology, Sapporo Kiyota Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The standard method for determining the noninvasive anaerobic threshold (AT) is the V-slope (VS) method. It is often supplemented by the ventilatory equivalent (VEQ) and end-tidal (ET) methods. However, a comparison issue arises: VS plots VCO Methods: V-slope is drawn as a square with equal sides, with the diagonal line representing the respiratory exchange ratio (R) = 1. V-slope generally follows the R = 1 line. This provides a framework in which the vertical difference (d) between a VCO Results: The mean AT (mL/min) and detection rates for d, VS, VEQ, and ET were 857 ± 414 (93%), 939 ± 407 (96%), 946 ± 176 (82%), and 862 ± 379 (85%), respectively. The d method identified AT significantly earlier than the conventional VS did ( Conclusions: The time-based V-slope was created by plotting changes in VCO2 from the R = 1 diagonal line against time; it aligned all three AT detecting methods on the same time axis, allowing precise detection of differences between methods. It also made AT detection more reliable, probably because the upward inflection breakpoint arises from the flat baseline and does not have the overlapping data points seen in V-slope, making it easier to identify a breakpoint. The d graph also identified AT significantly earlier than V-slope did.

Indexed as

Anaerobic ThresholdExercise TestCarbon DioxideHumansOxygen ConsumptionPulmonary Gas ExchangeCarbon DioxideAnaerobic thresholdCardiopulmonary exercise testingV-slope

Identifiers

PMID42291411
PMCPMC13262543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.