Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291391›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2026

The effect of music therapy on cognition in neurorehabilitation: A pilot crossover randomized controlled trial.

Kar Gee Lim, Wang Feng Ng, Wen Fen Beh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kar Gee LimDepartment of Rehabilitation, SOCSO Rehabilitation Centre, Malacca, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0000-1859-0035
Wang Feng NgDepartment of Music Therapy, St Andrew's Community Hospital, Simei, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0007-8104-8290
Wen Fen BehDepartment of Music, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2974-1000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess the feasibility of this pilot study's design and implementation and to compare the effect of active and passive music therapy interventions and standard care on cognition in neurorehabilitation. Patients and methods: Participants aged 30 to 60 years with Mini-Mental State Examination scores between 10 and 22 and with no hearing impairment were included in this pilot crossover randomized controlled trial between October 2018 and August 2020. Each participant received one session of each of the following: active music therapy intervention consisting of instrument playing and singing, passive music therapy intervention consisting of relaxation and music imagery, and standard care, in a randomized sequence. Mini-Cog tests were conducted before and after each session, and the scores were collected for data analysis. Results: Thirty-eight participants (31 males and 7 females; mean age: 44.4±8.0 years; range, 30 to 60 years) were included in the final analyses. The Kendall's W values ranged from 0.011 to 0.25, indicating a small effect across different permutations. The results showed no significant difference in pre- and postintervention Mini-Cog test scores between the experimental and control conditions [χ Conclusion: This pilot study is feasible in its design, procedures, and interventions. The maximum observed effect of 0.25 was used to calculate the sample size for a full-scale study, proposing 88 participants. Despite the nonsignificant results, this study served as a valuable resource for future research in cognitive rehabilitation and music therapy.

Indexed as

Activecognitionmusic therapyneurorehabilitation needspassive.

Identifiers

PMID42291391
PMCPMC13261404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.