ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2026
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus dry needling for piriformis syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and dry needling (DN) in treating piriformis syndrome (PS). Patients and methods: This randomized controlled trial included 48 patients with PS between February 3, 2024, and August 23, 2024. The patients were randomized into DN and ESWT groups. The ESWT group received three sessions of ultrasound-guided ESWT, and the DN group received three sessions of ultrasound-guided DN. Static stretching exercises were given to both groups. Clinical evaluations were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) at baseline and one and three months after treatment. Results: Forty-four patients completed the study, with 23 patients (18 females, 5 males; mean age: 49.6±8.9 years; range, 33 to 70 years) in the ESWT group and 21 patients (16 females, 5 males; mean age: 50.4±9.2 years; range, 33 to 64 years) in the DN group. In both groups, there was a significant improvement in VAS pain, ODI, and LEFS scores at one and three months of follow-up compared to baseline (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in VAS, ODI, and LEFS scores between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, the combination of DN and stretching exercise, as well as ESWT and stretching exercise, was effective in terms of pain relief and functionality in patients with PS during a three-month follow-up period. These two treatment methods can be effectively used in patients with PS. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy can be considered as an alternative treatment method, particularly in patients with needle phobia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.