ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2026
Comparison of the short-term effectiveness of myofascial dextrose injection and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy in myofascial pain syndrome: A prospective, randomized clinical study.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of myofascial dextrose injection (MDI) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Patients and methods: Between July 2022 and December 2022, a total of 70 patients (8 males, 62 females; mean age: 38.8±11.1 years; range, 18 to 61 years) with MPS in the upper and/or middle trapezius muscle were included in this prospective, randomized clinical study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as the MDI group (n=35) and the ESWT group (n=35). The first group received MDI with 5% dextrose, while the second group received radial ESWT. Both groups received three sessions of treatment with one-week intervals. An exercise program was provided for all patients. Both groups were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for activity-related pain, Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) at baseline (pre-treatment), and at Weeks 2 and 4 (post-treatment). Results: Following treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS, PPT, NDI, and NHP scores (p<0.001). However, the MDI group demonstrated a higher improvement in the VAS scores at both Weeks 2 and 4 (p<0.001). The NDI scores were significantly more favorable in the MDI group at Weeks 2 and 4 (p=0.044 and p=0.011, respectively). In terms of PPT and NHP scores, the MDI group showed a significantly greater improvement at Week 4 (p=0.005 and p=0.013, respectively). Conclusion: Both MDI and ESWT treatments have positive effects on pain and functionality in MPS patients, while MDI seems to yield more favorable results compared to ESWT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.