Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291382›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2026

Comparison of the short-term effectiveness of myofascial dextrose injection and radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy in myofascial pain syndrome: A prospective, randomized clinical study.

Mehmet Arslan, Halil Ogut, Mehmet Karadag, Hayal Guler, Ayse Dicle Turhanoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet ArslanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Hatay, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8836-6554
Halil OgutDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Hatay, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0910-5728
Mehmet KaradagDepartment of Biostatistics, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Hatay, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9539-4193
Hayal GulerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Hatay, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-6703
Ayse Dicle TurhanogluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Hatay, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-6273-9589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of myofascial dextrose injection (MDI) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Patients and methods: Between July 2022 and December 2022, a total of 70 patients (8 males, 62 females; mean age: 38.8±11.1 years; range, 18 to 61 years) with MPS in the upper and/or middle trapezius muscle were included in this prospective, randomized clinical study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups as the MDI group (n=35) and the ESWT group (n=35). The first group received MDI with 5% dextrose, while the second group received radial ESWT. Both groups received three sessions of treatment with one-week intervals. An exercise program was provided for all patients. Both groups were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for activity-related pain, Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) at baseline (pre-treatment), and at Weeks 2 and 4 (post-treatment). Results: Following treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in VAS, PPT, NDI, and NHP scores (p<0.001). However, the MDI group demonstrated a higher improvement in the VAS scores at both Weeks 2 and 4 (p<0.001). The NDI scores were significantly more favorable in the MDI group at Weeks 2 and 4 (p=0.044 and p=0.011, respectively). In terms of PPT and NHP scores, the MDI group showed a significantly greater improvement at Week 4 (p=0.005 and p=0.013, respectively). Conclusion: Both MDI and ESWT treatments have positive effects on pain and functionality in MPS patients, while MDI seems to yield more favorable results compared to ESWT.

Indexed as

Dextroseextracorporeal shockwave therapyinjectionmyofascial pain syndromeneck painpain threshold.

Identifiers

PMID42291382
PMCPMC13261389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.