Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291362›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026

Pulmonary ground-glass opacity associated with cystic airspace: clinicopathological features and aggressiveness.

Ziwen Yu, Jianfu Li, Hongsheng Deng, Caichen Li, Zhuxing Chen, Shan Xiong, Feng Li, Ran Zhong, Haixuan Wang, Chunyan Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ziwen Yu *Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8418-5056
Jianfu Li *Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongsheng Deng *Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Caichen LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuxing ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shan XiongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ran ZhongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Haixuan WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunyan LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Danman ZhongChina State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease & National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yimin ZhongThe First Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University & The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Liping LiuChina State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease & National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenhua LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianxing HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary ground-glass opacity (GGO) is often considered to have inert biological behavior. However, whether the clinicopathological features and aggressiveness of GGO associated with cystic airspace (GGO-A) differ from GGO associated without cystic airspace (GGO-nA) remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological features and aggressiveness of GGO-A with GGO-nA. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with GGOs [lesion size: 0.5-2.0 cm, consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ≤50%] from 2017 to 2021. Patients were divided into GGO-As and GGO-nAs. Chi-squared, Mann-Whitney test, Kaplan-Meier analyses and Logistic regression were utilized for data analysis. Results: A total of 818 patients (266 with GGO-As and 552 with GGO-nAs) were enrolled. Compared to patients with GGO-nAs, patients with GGO-As had distinct clinical features: male [odds ratio (OR) =5.588, P<0.001], without family history of cancer (OR =5.121, P<0.001), with emphysema pulmonum (OR =3.228, P=0.003) and with pulmonary bullae (OR =2.634, P<0.001). Compared to GGO-nAs, GGO-As had more invasive adenocarcinomas (IAs) (75.8% Conclusions: GGO-A showed higher aggressiveness compared to GGO-nA, with more invasive histological subtypes, a higher frequency of KRAS mutations, and faster radiological progression. These findings suggested more proactive surveillance and potentially aggressive clinical management for GGO-As.

Indexed as

ground-glass opacity associated with cystic airspace (GGO-A)ground-glass opacity (GGO)lung adenocarcinomaLung cancerlung cancer associated with cystic airspace

Identifiers

PMID42291362
PMCPMC13263805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.