ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Analysis of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of intensive care unit staff regarding
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in an international standards-accredited Hanoi private general hospital. It comprised a self-administered cross-sectional survey containing 46 questions distributed to the ICU staff, followed by an in-depth semi-structured interview of selected participants. The survey covered demographic, knowledge, attitudes, and practices domains and utilized Likert-type and ranking scales. Descriptive and analytical statistics were applied to quantitative data and thematic analysis to qualitative insights. Results: A total of 32 ICU staff completed the survey, but only 11 (34.38%) scored above 50%. Knowledge was associated weakly with age and work experience but not gender or profession. Most participants recognized Conclusions: This study reveals a knowledge gap regarding
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.