ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026
Anesthetic management for orthognathic surgery under ERAS protocol: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This review aims to analyze the evolution and implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in orthognathic surgery, particularly focusing on anesthesia management including core components: multimodal analgesia, intraoperative hemorrhage control, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prevention, airway management, glucocorticoid application, and perioperative fluid management. The goal is to identify key strategies for improving patient recovery through evidence-based practices. Materials and methods: A narrative review of existing literature was conducted, analyzing studies published on ERAS and anesthesia management in orthognathic surgery from 1997 to the present. Results: This review highlights the progress of ERAS protocols, which optimize perioperative care by focusing on multimodal anesthesia management, controlled hypotension, and strategies to alleviate pain, nausea, and inflammation via the aforementioned anesthesia-specific interventions. It is evident that ERAS can reduce opioid consumption, shorten hospital stays, and improve overall recovery. However, no standardized ERAS protocol has been universally adopted for orthognathic surgery. Conclusions: ERAS protocols have shown promise in improving patient outcomes in orthognathic surgery, but further research and the development of a unified protocol with standardized anesthesia management specifications are needed. Multidisciplinary collaboration remains crucial to effectively implement ERAS practices. Clinical relevance: This review provides insights into the application of ERAS in orthognathic surgery and offers guidance for clinical practice, particularly regarding the optimization of anesthesia management with evidence-based anesthesia-specific ERAS interventions to promote faster recovery and minimize complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.