Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291270›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Planning to fail? Credibility and financing of corporate transition plans in hard-to-abate sectors.

Sophie Maria Anneke Klein, Friedemann Polzin, Xander Urbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sophie Maria Anneke KleinUtrecht University, Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development, Innovation Studies, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Friedemann PolzinUtrecht University, School of Economics (U.S.E.), Kriekenpitplein 21-22, 3584EC Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Xander UrbachMN Asset Management, Responsible Investment, Prinses Beatrixlaan 15, 2595AK Den Haag, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates whether corporate transition plans align with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, highlighting a structural tension between long-term decarbonization goals and the shorter financial planning cycles that influence investment behavior and corporate decision making. Drawing on the firm-level transition plans and financial data of 411 publicly listed companies in hard-to-abate sectors, the analysis assesses carbon performance alignment across near-term 2027/2028, medium-term 2035, and long-term 2050 horizons. The research examines how specific financial characteristics influence the credibility of corporate climate strategies and identifies leverage points for stakeholders to improve transition plan disclosure. The results show that alignment with a 1.5 °C trajectory is particularly weak in the medium term, precisely when transformative emission reductions are most critical. While many firms articulate ambitious climate commitments, these are often insufficiently embedded in financial planning. Stronger alignment between capital expenditure and climate objectives, alongside lower financing costs, is associated with more credible transition strategies.

Indexed as

EconomicsEnvironmental policySocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID42291270
PMCPMC13264030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.