Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291268›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

AI policy instrument and urban carbon emission intensity: Spatial analysis of Chinese cities.

Hui Yu, Ling Tang, Ziyu Qin, Zhuoming He, Yan Huang, Jianhui Ruan, Shouyang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hui YuSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Ling TangSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Ziyu QinAcademy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Zhuoming HeSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yan HuangSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Jianhui RuanSchool of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Shouyang WangSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance efficiency and reduce emissions, yet also intensifies energy demand through computation and infrastructure. This paradox raises a key question: whether AI policy instrument can reduce urban carbon emission intensity (CI)? Using the quasi-natural experiment of "National New Generation Artificial Intelligence Innovation Development Pilot Zone" (AIPZ), this paper investigates the policy's local and spillover impacts on urban CI. Results show that AIPZ reduces CI in pilot cities and neighboring regions. Mechanism analysis reveals that the improvements in labor productivity and green technology innovation serve as main mitigation pathways across local and neighboring areas, while rising computing power demand increases emissions. Energy efficiency gains, though effective in reducing local CI, generate no significant spatial spillovers. Together, the mitigation effects dominate, yielding a net carbon-mitigating outcome especially in eastern, resource-based, and high digital-infrastructure cities. These findings offer insights for fostering AI development via coordinated regional strategies.

Indexed as

Applied sciencesArtificial intelligenceEnvironmental science

Identifiers

PMID42291268
PMCPMC13264377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.