Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291211›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Neural selectivity for social interactions in the infant brain.

Manuel Mello, Emilie Serraille, Jean-Rémy Hochmann, Liuba Papeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuel MelloInstitut des Sciences Cognitives-Marc Jeannerod, UMR5229, Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 67 Bd. Pinel, 69675 Bron, France.
Emilie SerrailleInstitut des Sciences Cognitives-Marc Jeannerod, UMR5229, Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 67 Bd. Pinel, 69675 Bron, France.
Jean-Rémy HochmannInstitut des Sciences Cognitives-Marc Jeannerod, UMR5229, Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 67 Bd. Pinel, 69675 Bron, France.
Liuba PapeoInstitut des Sciences Cognitives-Marc Jeannerod, UMR5229, Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 67 Bd. Pinel, 69675 Bron, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social cognition develops in the second year of life. Yet even in the first months, infants show sophisticated representation of social interactions. The neural structures supporting these early capacities remain unknown. Here, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy, we show that, like adults, preverbal infants exhibit selective increase in the activity of posterior superior-temporal and temporo-parietal regions when viewing individuals facing and moving toward (vs. away from) each other, as if interacting. No reliable difference emerged between 6- and 10-month-olds, although neural effects were more widespread in the older group, who also showed consistently longer looking times toward interacting dyads. Neural effects of social interactions were spatially distinct from effects of body motion perception, indicating separate mechanisms for perceiving biological agents and interacting agents. The early tuning to visuo-spatial cues of social engagement documented here may orient infants' attention toward social interactions, thereby facilitating the discovery and learning of human social relationships.

Indexed as

biological sciencescognitive neurosciencedevelopmental neurosciencehealth scienceshuman physiologymedicinenatural sciencesneurologyneurosciencepediatrics

Identifiers

PMID42291211
PMCPMC13264107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.