Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291193›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Stress-testing the EU energy system: Modeling resilience without Russian gas.

Chi Kong Chyong, Henrik Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chi Kong ChyongOxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford, England.
Henrik SchmidtOxford Institute for Energy Studies & School of Public Affairs, Sciences Po Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Europe's gas and electricity markets are deeply intertwined, making the system vulnerable to compound supply and demand shocks-particularly following the loss of Russian pipeline gas. Using a global coupled gas-electricity partial-equilibrium model that incorporates LNG trade, storage behavior, demand-side response, and multiple weather scenarios, we show that Europe can generally maintain physical supply even under severe stress. The principal vulnerability lies not in outright shortages but in sharp, asymmetric price spikes, especially during cold winters or when LNG supply is constrained. LNG import capacity, gas storage, hydropower, and fuel switching in the power sector act as key stabilizers, though network bottlenecks persist in Eastern and Southern Europe. Accelerated renewables deployment materially reduces exposure to gas-linked price volatility, whereas additional Russian LNG has only a marginal impact on prices. These findings point to the importance of system-wide stress testing, targeted infrastructure investment, and reducing gas's role as the marginal price setter in electricity markets.

Indexed as

EconomicsEnergy modelingEnergy sustainabilityEnergy systems

Identifiers

PMID42291193
PMCPMC13253129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.