ArticleiScience2026
Environmental disclosure and supply chain carbon leakage.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amid global carbon goals and supply chain carbon leakage, the effectiveness of corporate environmental responsibility disclosure requires reexamination. We explore how listed companies' environmental disclosure impacts upstream and downstream carbon emissions. Results indicate that environmental disclosure increases, rather than reduces, supply chain emissions, confirming hidden emissions under explicit corporate responsibility. Mechanistically, the scale effect acts globally, while structural and technological effects are exclusively upstream and downstream, respectively. Furthermore, upstream suppliers face dual suppression from carbon transfer via digital speech and action, whereas downstream customers are affected solely by digital action. Additionally, upstream carbon transfer targets long-term stable suppliers, while downstream transfer targets nonmajor, long-term customers. This study provides an objective basis for resolving supply chain carbon transfer dilemmas and formulating targeted emission reduction policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.