ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Non-technical skills in the management of endoscopic adverse events.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adverse events are an inherent risk of performing endoscopic procedures. Although the rate of serious adverse events during routine endoscopic procedures is relatively low, most gastroenterologists will encounter at least one significant adverse event during their careers. Traditional endoscopic training largely focuses on teaching the technical management of adverse events with less emphasis on the cognitive and interpersonal competencies that are critical to patient safety. Increasing attention has therefore been directed toward endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) and their role in preventing and managing endoscopy-related adverse events. ENTS embody the cognitive and social skills needed to perform high-quality patient care during endoscopic procedures. The major categories of ENTS include communication, teamwork, situational awareness, leadership, judgment and decision making, and professionalism. Deficiencies in ENTS could potentially lead to endoscopy-related patient safety incidents. The aim of this review is to explore the key domains of ENTS and their relevance in the management of endoscopy-related adverse events. The review will additionally examine educational strategies to improve ENTS including simulation-based training, structured curricula, and team-focused interventions. Future research is needed to develop validated ENTS assessment tools and evaluate standardized training programs to improve ENTS. Strengthening ENTS education may ultimately improve patient safety and outcomes in endoscopic practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.