Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291149›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Overall survival of patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (DEEPSARC): a real world nationwide retrospective cohort study in France.

Jean-Yves Blay, Vincent Thevenet, Emmanuel Oger, Axel Le Cesne, Maud Toulmonde, François Gouin, Sylvie Bonvalot, André Happe, Erwan Drezen, François Le Loarer and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jean-Yves BlayMedical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
Vincent ThevenetTeam EPICENE (U1219), Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University of Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France.
Emmanuel OgerUniversity of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Axel Le CesneMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Maud ToulmondeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
François GouinSurgical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard and Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.
Sylvie BonvalotSurgical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
André HappeUniversity of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Erwan DrezenCUBR SAS, Rennes, France.
François Le LoarerUMR1312, BRIC, BoRdeaux Institute of OnCology, University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux, France.
Marie KaranianDepartment of Pathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Carine NgoDepartment of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Gonzague De PinieuxDepartment of Pathology, CHU and University of Tours, Tours, France.
Anne Gomez-MascardDepartment of Pathology, IUCT Oncopole and University of Toulouse, France.
Emmanuelle BompasMedical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO Nantes), Nantes-Angers, France.
Nicolas MacagnoDepartment of Pathology, Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Nelly FirminMedical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, INSERM U1194, IRCM, Univ Montpellier; Montpellier, France.
Hugo CrochetInformatics, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Lionel PerrierCentre Léon Bérard, CNRS, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Université Jean Monnet Saint-Etienne, Emlyon Business School, GATE, Lyon, 69008, France.
Françoise DucimetiereEvaluation of Medical Practices and Networks, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Claire Chemin-AiriauEvaluation of Medical Practices and Networks, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Noémie HuchetEpidemiological and Clinical Research Unit, Institut Bergonié and University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Nicolas PenelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret and University of Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de Santé et des Pratiques Médicales, CHU de Lille, Lille, France.
Simone Mathoulin-PelissierTeam EPICENE (U1219), Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, University of Bordeaux, INSERM CIC 1401, Bordeaux, France.
French Sarcoma Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves overall survival (OS) after complete resection in localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains unproven and optional in guidelines. We measured OS in patients with operated non-metastatic STS treated with or without AC in the nationwide exhaustive NETSARC+ registry. Methods: The DEEPSARC project linked the NETSARC+ registry and the French nationwide health data system (SNDS) into a retrospective cohort. Adults with non-metastatic, undergoing primary surgical resection between 2012 and 2017 were included, excluding those with incomplete linkage data or prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We analysed the entire series of 8331 patients with successful linkage and a complete-case subset of 4296 patients. Survival with or without AC were compared using crude and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models, including adjustment for confounders and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Sensitivity analyses and subgroups analysis in high-risk patients were performed. Findings: In the complete-case series, the commonest histotypes were liposarcoma (30%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (23%) and leiomyosarcoma (17%). Overall, 389 (9.1%) patients received AC and, compared with those not receiving AC, had fewer comorbidities and presented more high-risk tumour features. With 5.8 years median follow-up, 5-yr OS was 61% (95%CI: 60-63) in the entire series, and 64% (95%CI: 63-66) in the complete-case analysis. 5-yr OS was inferior in patients receiving AC, both in the entire series (50% [47%-54%] vs. 63% [61%-64%]) and in the complete-case analysis (53% [48-59%] vs. 65% [64-67%]). After adjustment (HR = 1.46 [1.12-1.93]) or IPTW (HR = 1.56 [1.17-2.08]), AC remained associated with inferior OS. Findings were consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Interpretation: In this real-world nationwide study, AC was not associated with superior OS, but rather with an inferior OS in patients operated of a localized STS and did not compensate for the adverse prognostic profile of treated patients. Future research should therefore focus on identifying predictive biomarkers in order to better identify patients who are likely to derive real benefit from systemic treatment. Funding: This work was supported by the Health Data Hub; the Institut National Du Cancer and the French Ministry of Health (Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins, DGOS) for the NETSARC, RRePS and RESOS networks; the INTERSARC+ program; the Agence Nationale de la Recherche; the LYriCAN+ program; the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; the Ligue contre le Cancer (Comité de l'Ain); the Fondation ARC; and the European Reference Network for Rare Adult Solid Cancers.

Indexed as

Adjuvant chemotherapyHealth Data HubObservational studyReal-world dataSoft tissue sarcomaSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID42291149
PMCPMC13264196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.