ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Overall survival of patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy (DEEPSARC): a real world nationwide retrospective cohort study in France.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) improves overall survival (OS) after complete resection in localized soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains unproven and optional in guidelines. We measured OS in patients with operated non-metastatic STS treated with or without AC in the nationwide exhaustive NETSARC+ registry. Methods: The DEEPSARC project linked the NETSARC+ registry and the French nationwide health data system (SNDS) into a retrospective cohort. Adults with non-metastatic, undergoing primary surgical resection between 2012 and 2017 were included, excluding those with incomplete linkage data or prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We analysed the entire series of 8331 patients with successful linkage and a complete-case subset of 4296 patients. Survival with or without AC were compared using crude and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models, including adjustment for confounders and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Sensitivity analyses and subgroups analysis in high-risk patients were performed. Findings: In the complete-case series, the commonest histotypes were liposarcoma (30%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (23%) and leiomyosarcoma (17%). Overall, 389 (9.1%) patients received AC and, compared with those not receiving AC, had fewer comorbidities and presented more high-risk tumour features. With 5.8 years median follow-up, 5-yr OS was 61% (95%CI: 60-63) in the entire series, and 64% (95%CI: 63-66) in the complete-case analysis. 5-yr OS was inferior in patients receiving AC, both in the entire series (50% [47%-54%] vs. 63% [61%-64%]) and in the complete-case analysis (53% [48-59%] vs. 65% [64-67%]). After adjustment (HR = 1.46 [1.12-1.93]) or IPTW (HR = 1.56 [1.17-2.08]), AC remained associated with inferior OS. Findings were consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Interpretation: In this real-world nationwide study, AC was not associated with superior OS, but rather with an inferior OS in patients operated of a localized STS and did not compensate for the adverse prognostic profile of treated patients. Future research should therefore focus on identifying predictive biomarkers in order to better identify patients who are likely to derive real benefit from systemic treatment. Funding: This work was supported by the Health Data Hub; the Institut National Du Cancer and the French Ministry of Health (Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins, DGOS) for the NETSARC, RRePS and RESOS networks; the INTERSARC+ program; the Agence Nationale de la Recherche; the LYriCAN+ program; the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer; the Ligue contre le Cancer (Comité de l'Ain); the Fondation ARC; and the European Reference Network for Rare Adult Solid Cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.