ArticleMolecular therapy. Oncology2026
Innovative photodynamic therapy using rose bengal for the treatment of human melanoma.
Article in Molecular therapy. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rose Bengal (RB), a xanthene dye with established antitumor and immunomodulatory properties, is a cytotoxic molecule evaluated in human melanoma through phase 2 clinical trials. RB demonstrates intrinsic therapeutic activity; however, its clinical application may be limited at high doses because of potential side effects, including photosensitivity. In this context, and given that RB also functions as a photosensitizer (PS), our objective was to enhance its efficacy by introducing a photodynamic therapy (PDT) approach using green light (550 nm) excitation. PDT relies on activation of a PS in the presence of oxygen, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) that induce tumor cell death and stimulate immune responses. In terms of relative efficacy, PDT-RB was 121 and 40 times more effective than RB alone in HBL and LND melanoma cell lines, respectively. This reduced the RB concentration from 492 μM to 32 μM for HBL and from 1,043 μM to 74 μM for LND, achieving 80% cell death. This combination of light and low RB concentrations enhances ROS production and induces necrosis in metastatic melanoma cells. Moreover, PDT-RB preserves PBMC proliferation compared with high-dose RB, suggesting reduced immunotoxicity and potential immunogenic properties, supporting further investigation in more advanced models for future validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.