ArticleJournal of multimorbidity and comorbidity
Recommendations for conducting qualitative research on multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) from a qualitative methods community of practice.
Article in Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Perceptions of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: An Analysis of Mass Observation Accounts.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- From community of practice to methodological governance: Building a living infrastructure for qualitative multiple long-term conditions research.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing prevalence of multiple long-term conditions (MLTC) - two or more long-term health conditions - has been recognised as one of the most significant health challenges facing contemporary societies. People living with MLTC experience poorer outcomes than people with one long-term condition and may be disadvantaged by health care systems configured for single conditions. Recognition of the significance of these inequities has led to increased investments in MLTC research, and a body of qualitative literature on lived experience is developing. However, conducting qualitative MLTC research presents challenges to researchers. Encompassing an extensive range of condition combinations, the MLTC population is incredibly diverse, and constructing a sampling strategy for the small numbers of participants typical in qualitative inquiry requires careful thought. Additionally, MLTC is a construct not embedded in public consciousness, which may affect participant self-identification and research engagement. Furthermore, the risk of issues commonly experienced in qualitative health research, such as participant distress and low recruitment rates, can be exacerbated due to the ill-health experienced by some people living with MLTC. In this article, we share reflections from a cross-institution Qualitative Methods Community of Practice in MLTC Research, describing the challenges experienced and practical steps taken to address difficulties and mitigate risks. We aim to provide tips and guidance to qualitative health researchers new to MLTC inquiry to support planning and delivery of their research in this rapidly growing field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.