ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Gender and Educational Pathway Differences in 360-Degree Evaluations During Postgraduate Year Training in Taiwan.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postgraduate year (PGY) training in Taiwan is a 2-year program for new physicians. The 360-degree evaluation offers multisource feedback on clinical competencies, yet it remains unclear whether performance varies by educational background or gender, and how self-assessment compares with others' evaluations. Methods: We analyzed 116 PGY trainees (2019-2021) at a Taiwanese teaching hospital. Each trainee was assessed in 4 domains-clinical care, medical skills, communication, and teamwork-by attending physicians, chief residents, peers, nurses, and self-assessment. Patients completed an 11-item satisfaction survey. Scores used 6-point Likert scales (1-6), converted to 0% to 100%. Independent Results: The evaluation showed strong reliability (Cronbach's α = .98). No significant differences appeared between undergraduate and post-baccalaureate graduates (all Conclusion: Graduates of different medical school tracks received equivalent evaluation ratings in this PGY program. Female trainees received higher ratings in communication and teamwork, whereas males showed greater self-confidence in clinical care. Trainees generally underrated their performance compared with physician evaluations. These findings underscore the value of mentorship and 360-degree feedback in fostering self-awareness and professional growth during early postgraduate training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.