ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography to triage echocardiography for structural heart disease diagnosis in a low-resource setting.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transportability of an artificial intelligence electrocardiography model for structural heart disease: external validation and recalibration of EchoNext-Mini in MIMIC-IV.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence, preventive cardiology and making time for what matters: a fellow's voice.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- The future of CV prevention science depends on how we communicate: why simultaneous publication matters.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Policy, Financing, and Regulatory Barriers to Adopting AI-Powered Electrocardiography Interpretation Clinical Decision Support System in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Timely diagnosis of structural heart disease (SHD) is often constrained by limited access to echocardiography in low-resource settings. Although electrocardiography (ECG) is widely available, traditional interpretation poorly reflects underlying SHD risk, leading to inefficient referral for echocardiography. Methods: We used data from PROVAR+, a large community-based cardiovascular screening program in operation since 2014 in Brazil. In this program, adults underwent 12-lead ECGs paired with either screening point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) (screening cohort) or comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (imaging cohort). We evaluated the performance of a validated artificial intelligence model in identifying probable SHD from ECG images compared with Minnesota Code-defined major ECG abnormalities, with POCUS as a screening reference. We then assessed the health-system impact of AI-ECG-guided echocardiography referral using paired ECG-TTE data by simulating standard versus AI-prioritized referral strategies under an established health-system echocardiography capacity. Results: Among 3282 individuals in the screening cohort, AI-ECG demonstrated substantially higher discrimination for probable SHD than Minnesota Code-based major ECG abnormalities (area under the curve 0.73 vs 0.52), with higher positive predictive value and significant net reclassification improvement (35%), driven primarily by improved identification of individuals without disease. Decision-curve analysis showed consistently greater net benefit for AI-ECG across clinically relevant referral thresholds. In the imaging cohort ( Conclusion: AI-enabled ECG interpretation improved the identification of SHD beyond conventional ECG assessment. Applying AI-ECG to echocardiography referral workflows can substantially accelerate diagnosis under limited imaging capacity, supporting more efficient and equitable use of cardiovascular diagnostic resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.