ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2026
Steatotic liver disease indices for cardiovascular event prediction: Panasonic cohort study 28.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Noninvasive hepatic steatosis indices may aid in cardiovascular risk assessment; however, their comparative predictive abilities remain uncertain. Methods: We analyzed data from 134,604 Japanese adults aged ≥ 40 years who underwent health checkups between 2011 and 2020. Four indices (the ZJU index, Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI), Fatty Liver Index (FLI), and K-NAFLD score) were evaluated for their ability to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses based on 10-year follow-up were performed using univariable Cox models including each index. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess predictive performance. We compared AUCs between pairs of indices to determine which performed better, using 1,000 bootstrap resamples and 95 % confidence intervals. Results: During a total follow-up period of approximately 860,000 person-years, 3,532 participants developed MACE (incidence: 4 per 1,000 person-years). All indices were significantly associated with MACE incidence. FLI showed the highest AUC for predicting MACE (0.615), followed by the K-NAFLD score (0.613), with optimal cutoffs of 23.33 and -2.61, respectively. Both indices outperformed the ZJU index and HSI, with statistically significant differences in AUCs. No significant difference was observed between FLI and the K-NAFLD score. Conclusions: The FLI and K-NAFLD score demonstrated relatively better predictive performance for cardiovascular events compared with the ZJU index and HSI. These findings may support their use in public health screening and clinical risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.