Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42291022›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2026

Process Improvement Before Artificial Intelligence and Automation: Building Trust With the Understand-Transform-Sustain Framework.

Alejandro Fabrega Gerbaud, Marta Berguido de la Guardia, Sandra C Booth, LaRissa Adams, Matthew D Cox, Kimberly Hunsinger, Nelly Tan, Melissa Gulden, Terri Menser, Ross Reichard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alejandro Fabrega GerbaudAcute Care Research Consortium, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Marta Berguido de la GuardiaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Sandra C BoothQuality Academy, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
LaRissa AdamsQuality Academy, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Matthew D CoxQuality Academy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Kimberly HunsingerQuality Academy, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Nelly TanQuality Academy, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Melissa GuldenQuality Academy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Terri MenserAcute Care Research Consortium, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
Ross ReichardQuality Academy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Sean C DowdyRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Pablo Moreno FrancoAcute Care Research Consortium, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are rapidly transforming health care, yet their integration into clinical workflows often falls short owing to technical, ethical, and organizational challenges. Lack of trust emerges as the central hurdle, encompassing both patient and provider confidence in AI systems. Patients raise concerns over safety, transparency, and the physician-patient relationship, whereas providers express apprehension toward algorithmic opacity, data quality and, legal ambiguity. To address these concerns, the understand, transform, and sustain (UTS) framework offers a behavior-based, systems-level approach to AI deployment. Developed by Mayo Clinic's Quality Academy, UTS integrates process improvement principles across 3 phases, emphasizing stakeholder engagement, transparency and patient safety throughout the AI lifecycle. The understand phase identifies inefficiencies by mapping workflows, collecting data, and recognizing areas for improvement, ensuring developers create tools that address appropriate priorities. In the transform phase, interventions are designed, implemented and tested through improvement cycles and feedback loops. Data to build algorithms is carefully evaluated to avoid biases, and AI output is assessed for opacity risk to maintain transparency and explainability. The sustain phase monitors outcomes and standardizes practices for long-term value. Data audits and automated extraction tools are applied for fidelity and harmonization, promoting scalability and collaboration among organizations. By keeping human intelligence central, UTS represents a catalyst for responsible innovation by aligning technological advancement with clinical priorities. Previous frameworks are more prescriptive in terms of tools and actions; UTS builds on this, targeting the underlying decision-making teams needed for sustainable process improvement, critical for successful health care transformation.

Identifiers

PMID42291022
PMCPMC13264061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.