ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2026
An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: This Materials and methods: Thirty disk-shaped specimens (10 per group) were prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions and stored in deionized water. Fluoride ion release was measured using a fluoride ion-selective electrode at 5 intervals: 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni Results: All three materials exhibited the highest fluoride release on the 7th day, followed by a decline. Cention N showed the greatest fluoride release overall, peaking significantly on day 7 (11.1 ppm). GC Fuji IX had a second peak on day 14, while Ionolux exhibited moderate but consistent fluoride release throughout the study period. Conclusion: Cention N released the highest amount of fluoride among the materials tested, indicating its strong potential for caries prevention. All materials demonstrated an initial burst release followed by a gradual decline, aligning with effective long-term fluoride delivery. The findings support the continued use of fluoride-releasing materials in minimally invasive pediatric restorative dentistry. Clinical significance: This study highlights that Cention N and Ionolux can offer handling and esthetic benefits. Effective and sustained fluoride release profiles, especially the initial high release followed by a controlled decline, support their use in minimally invasive and preventive dentistry. How to cite this article: Sneha SB, Suresh KJ, Varma BR,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.