ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Identifying dyslexia-consistent reading profiles in mild intellectual disability: cluster-derived severity gradients and severity-calibrated classification rules.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06215092 (Perinatal, Cognitive and Social-emotional Correlates of Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Learning Difficulties in Children and Adolescents, From a Biopsychosocial Perspective.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Perinatal, Cognitive and Social-emotional Correlates of Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Learning Difficulties in Children and Adolescents, From a Biopsychosocial Perspective.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Translating dyslexia constructs to mild intellectual disability (MID) is challenging because population-based cut-offs may label broadly expected low attainment as 'specific'. This study combined person-centered profiling with explicit, ICD-11-guided, severity-calibrated classification rules to quantify when and why over-identification occurs in MID. Methods: Nationwide diagnostic data from 446 students with MID were analyzed using age-normed sten scores from the SB6/18 battery (decoding, reading fluency, reading comprehension, phonetic coding, rapid automatized naming [RAN]). We conducted hierarchical clustering with bootstrap stability and compared six rule-based groupings that systematically varied severity thresholds and inclusion of phonological/RAN indicators. Results: A robust two-cluster solution reflected a dominant severity gradient across reading and related markers. Broad criteria classified 88% of the sample, including many higher-performing cases. Introducing an extreme-severity anchor reduced prevalence (37%) and concentrated classified cases within the lower-performing profile. Notably, when very low decoding (sten = 1) was required, adding phonological/RAN criteria yielded little further classification gain under this rule structure. Conclusions: Dyslexia-consistent profiles can be delineated within mild ID, but prevalence and subgroup coherence depend critically on severity operationalization. Word-level reading-especially decoding and fluency-provides the most robust basis for subgroup identification; phonological/RAN indicators showed limited incremental classification value within the present rule structure. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT06215092.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.