ArticleCardiology research and practice2026
Prediction of Ascending Aortic Dilation and Analysis of Influencing Factors in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model.
Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of Ascending Aortic Dilation and Analysis of Influencing Factors in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Developing a machine learning (ML) model to predict the risk of ascending aortic dilation in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to interpret and visualize the model. Methods: This study enrolled 102 BAV patients, who were divided into two subgroups based on ascending aorta diameter (dilated and nondilated). All participants underwent routine echocardiography, clinical baseline data collection, and measurement of plasma matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs). Feature selection was performed using univariate analysis followed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-logistic regression (LR) method. Five common ML prediction models were developed: support vector machine (SVM), LR, gradient-boosting machine (GBM), neural network (NNET), and Naïve Bayes (NB) classifier. To identify the best-performing predictive model for ascending aortic dilation in BAV patients, an evaluation of predictive efficacy was carried out by employing ROC curves, calibration curves, and DCA curves. Finally, the optimal model's predictions were interpreted using SHAP. Results: Random allocation of the entire patient population resulted in a training set ( Conclusions: The GBM model offers a valuable tool for predicting ascending aortic dilation in BAV patients. Moreover, SHAP analysis enhances the model's utility by providing clear, actionable insights for clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.