ArticleJAMIA open2026
Early prediction of unplanned critical care transfers in children using EHR-based ensemble machine learning.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early recognition of unplanned ICU transfer is critical for improving outcomes, yet existing pediatric warning systems lack accuracy and timeliness. We developed machine learning models predicting unplanned ICU transfer up to 24 hours in advance. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data at a quaternary-care children's hospital with 175 PICU/NICU beds. Patients aged 0-24 years admitted to medical or surgical wards for ≥30 hours between 2019 and 2024 were included. The cohort was divided into development (2019-2022) and external validation (2023-2024). The F-WIN model is an ensemble of extreme gradient-boosting models trained at varying prediction horizons (1-24 hours). The primary outcome was unplanned transfer to PICU/NICU, defined as transfer followed by clinical deterioration within 12 hours, including death, administration of vasopressors or inotropes, intubation, or new non-invasive ventilation. We compared F-WIN's performance with the bedside Pediatric Early Warning System and the Watcher and Clinician Concern programs. Metrics included areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Results: Among 72 419 floor stays (49 283 patients) in the full dataset, 816 stays (1.1%) involving 769 patients (1.6%) ended in unplanned ICU transfer. Using 647 variables, F-WIN achieved strong discrimination across horizons (8-hour AUROC: 0.93; [95%CI, 0.91-0.95], AUPRC: 0.36 [95%CI, 0.29-0.43]); 24-hour AUROC: 0.91 ([95%CI, 0.89-0.93], AUPRC: 0.22 [95%CI, 0.17-0.29]) and outperformed all comparators. A parsimonious model preserved performance (24-hour Conclusions: F-WIN accurately predicted unplanned transfer up to 24 hours in advance, outperforming existing tools. A parsimonious model maintained similar performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.