ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026
Observations from the RESET clinical trial: A post-hoc per protocol analysis of clinical outcomes with percutaneous 60-day medial branch PNS in chronic low back pain.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04246281 (A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Trial of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) for the Treatment of Back Pain
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Not who we treat, but how we treat: Emphasizing treatment adherence in neuromodulation outcomes.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the lumbar medial branches is a minimally invasive treatment option for chronic low back pain (CLBP). A recent randomized controlled trial (RESET Clinical Trial) met its primary endpoint, with a significantly greater proportion of participants treated with 60-day PNS (n = 112) reporting ≥50% reductions in average low back pain compared to those treated with physician-directed usual care with standard interventional management (n = 110; e.g., ablations, injections, physical therapy) at 3 months post start of treatment. Objective: Building on the published findings from the Full Analysis Set, this post-hoc analysis primarily explored whether per protocol treatment delivery (bilateral stimulation that generated sensations covering the majority of the painful region in the low back for 6-12 h per day) was associated with response to 60-day PNS. Additional post-hoc evaluations explored the influence of clinical variables across the study population and investigated outcomes within exploratory subgroups of common clinical pain profiles (e.g. Methods: Univariate logistic regressions evaluated associations between variables (treatment delivery and clinical variables) and responder rate (≥50% reduction in average pain at 3 months). Results: The results suggest per protocol treatment delivery is associated with positive outcomes following treatment with 60-day PNS for CLBP (odds ratio = 3.04, 95% confidence interval = [1.16, 7.93], p = 0.023). Within this clinical trial's population as defined by the inclusion and exclusion criteria, neither clinical variables (e.g., age, pain duration, gender, average pain intensity, pain interference, and disability) nor response to a medial branch block had a significant impact on treatment response. Additional post-hoc analyses showed positive outcomes with 60-day PNS among exploratory cohorts defined by common facetogenic and discovertebral pain features. Reductions in pain extended to improvements in pain interference and disability, with benefits sustained at all completed timepoints through 6 months (follow-up beyond 6 months is ongoing). Conclusions: Together, these findings suggest that 60-day PNS treatment delivery is an important determinant of outcomes, underscoring the role of proper lead implantation, patient education, and treatment adherence in clinical practice. ClinicalTrials gov identifier: NCT04246281.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.