ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Isoflurane for difficult sedation in critically ill children: a retrospective analysis in a mixed pediatric intensive care population.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: When standard intravenous regimens fail, children in the pediatric intensive care unit often face escalating sedative polypharmacy with potential harm; we therefore evaluated inhaled isoflurane as a rescue sedation strategy in mechanically ventilated children with failure of a conventional sedation regimen. Methods: In this single-center retrospective observational study (2017-2020) in a 10-bed tertiary mixed pediatric intensive care unit (medical, neurologic, cardiac and traumatic conditions), isoflurane was delivered via an anesthetic conserving device while concomitant intravenous sedatives were down-titrated to sedation targets assessed by the COMFORT-B score, and cardiovascular support was quantified using the vasoactive-inotropic score. Results: Twenty-one children were analyzed (median age 3.0 years; median Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 score 15.9%); isoflurane was initiated after a median of 3 days of prior sedation and continued for a median of 8 days; the median number of sedative agents decreased from 4 to 3 ( Discussion: Isoflurane can meaningfully reduce sedative burden and agitation-related rescue interventions in difficult-to-sedate children, but the observed increase in vasoactive support and frequent delirium/withdrawal after prolonged use underscore the need for vigilant hemodynamic monitoring and structured down-titration-key considerations for centers contemplating volatile-based rescue sedation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.