ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Awareness of Duchenne muscular dystrophy among medical staff in China: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) necessitates lifelong integrated management, awareness of the condition among healthcare professionals in China remains lacking. This study assesses DMD-related knowledge within a national rare disease alliance to identify critical gaps in clinical practice. Methods: Data were collected via an online survey of medical staff across general, maternal-child, and pediatric hospitals. A structured questionnaire, developed by a multicenter expert team and refined through pilot testing, was used to assess awareness of disease diagnosis, treatment, and policy. Convenience sampling was employed, and eligible participants completed the survey anonymously. Results: Out of 510 distributed questionnaires, 496 valid responses were analyzed. Participants' age ranged from 21 to 68 years, with a mean of 35.73 ± 7.32 years. The overall awareness rate for DMD was 54.64%, with specific rates of 82.46% for treatment, 67.74% for diagnosis, and 42.74% for policy. Univariable analyses indicated that sex, age, occupation, professional title, educational background, professional specialty, and hospital type were associated with awareness levels ( Conclusion: Frontline medical staff in China have critical knowledge gaps regarding DMD genomic diagnostics and related orphan drug policies. These gaps are strongly driven by occupational disparities, especially the systematically lower awareness among nursing staff. To build the multidisciplinary clinical infrastructure needed for the coming era of precision genomic therapy, it is imperative to shift from general professional education to targeted, competency-based DMD training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.