ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2026
Clinical practice patterns in the pre-endoscopic management of individuals presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: results of an international survey.
Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite recent guideline recommendations on managing acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (AUGIB), mortality rates have not substantially improved over the years. Objectives: We aimed to understand real-life pre-endoscopic assessment and management practices in AUGIB. Design: We conducted an international online survey from April to November 2023. Methods: Key domains captured respondents' demographics and clinical practice location, definitions of hemodynamic instability, and pre-endoscopic assessment. We provided descriptive proportions of responses. Secondary analyses explored differences in responses based on years of clinical experience. Results: Among the 533 clinicians who completed the survey, 47.1% reported using a triage system for AUGIB, and only 60.4% applied risk stratification scores at the time of presentation. Normal saline and balanced crystalloid fluids were almost equally preferred for initial fluid resuscitation. Hemodynamically unstable patients were typically managed in emergency departments and/or intensive care units. Over 85% of respondents followed a restrictive blood transfusion strategy in stable patients, but this dropped to 50.3% in hemodynamically unstable cases. Among respondents, 34.3% did not routinely use prokinetics, and 27.6% avoided their use, even in cases of severe bleeding or suspected gastric emptying disorders. The majority (87.1%) prescribed proton pump inhibitors before endoscopy. For suspected variceal bleeding, 83.7% reported using vasoactive agents, and 74.3% reported administering prophylactic antibiotics. Younger clinicians were more likely to follow recent guidelines than those with over 15 years of clinical experience. Conclusion: We found considerable variation in the pre-endoscopic management of individuals with AUGIB. Overall adherence to international guidelines was inconsistent, which may have implications for patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.