ArticleEndocrinology2026
Examining mechanisms by which acute psychosocial stress disrupts the proestrous LH surge and ovulation in female mice.
Article in Endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stress most often inhibits reproduction. Exposure to an acute layered psychosocial stress paradigm (ALPS) on proestrus disrupts the LH surge in 60% to 70% of adult female mice without interfering with the progression of the estrous cycle. The present study aims to expand on these observations by investigating effects of ALPS exposure on ovulation and potential mechanisms involved in surge disruption. The most common response to ALPS exposure was disruption of the LH surge and blockade of ovulation; however, in some mice in which no LH surge was detected, ovulation did occur. Factors from the adrenal cortex and medulla, corticosterone and catecholamines (norepinephrine and epinephrine), respectively, are increased during stress; we thus tested whether these factors mediate the effects of stress on the LH surge and ovulation by applying ALPS in adrenalectomized (ADX) animals. ADX did not reverse the disruptions of the LH surge/ovulation after ALPS. Further studies aimed to investigate potential roles of individual adrenal factors in this response. We tested whether administering corticosterone, in the absence of stress, was sufficient to suppress the LH surge and ovulation. It was not. Finally, we tested whether blockade of β-adrenergic signaling during ALPS would rescue the LH surge and/or ovulation. Propranolol, a nonselective β-adrenergic receptor blocker, given 1 hour before ALPS failed to reverse the disruptive effects of stress. Together, these data confirm the effectiveness of ALPS in disrupting both the LH surge and ovulation. They further indicate that the adrenal gland is dispensable for these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.