ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2026
Quantifying discrepancy between indicated and actual oxygen flow rates delivered by Comweld Ezi-flow low and standard flowmeters under hyperbaric conditions: a technical report.
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: During clinical use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in hyperbaric conditions at our centre, upward titration of indicated sweep gas flow rates is required to maintain adequate CO₂ clearance. This project measured the impact of hyperbaric pressure on oxygen flow rates delivered by the Comweld Ezi-Flow flowmeters used in our centre. Methods: Oxygen flow rates through Comweld Ezi-flow standard and low oxygen gas flowmeters were set at 101.3 kPa (1 atmosphere absolute [atm abs]) and then measured at intervals up to 284 kPa (2.8 atm abs) using a calibrated gas flow analyser, with cross verification against a small Douglas bag test type apparatus. During testing, the chamber was compressed and decompressed at a rate of 10 kPa·min⁻¹. Flow rates during chamber compression and decompression were compared. Results: The indicated rate of oxygen gas flow through the unadjusted flowmeters changed minimally - typically rising by a maximum of half of the diameter of the indicator ball. The actual (volumetric) flow, tested across indicated flow rates from 3 to 12 L·min⁻¹, was consistently reduced by approximately 50% as the chamber pressure increased from 101.3 to 284 kPa (1 to 2.8 atm abs). A slightly smaller reduction was observed when assessing the low flowmeter across the same pressure range; reductions of 40.0 and 43.3% were demonstrated at 0.3 to 0.6 L·min⁻¹ respectively. Differences in flow rates between compression and decompression were minor except at the very lowest flows. Conclusions: At 284 kPa (2.8 atm abs), actual volumetric flow of oxygen through Comweld Ezi-Flow flowmeters is dramatically reduced and this needs appropriate compensation to ensure therapeutic aims are achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.