Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42290523›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2026

Feasibility of diagnosing major depressive disorder with a panel of serum and urine biomarkers.

Mike C Jentsch, Huibert Burger, Marjolein B M Meddens, Sjoerd M van Belkum, Brenda W J H Penninx, Marcus J M Meddens, Robert A Schoevers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mike C JentschDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/03cv38k47University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4029-7876
Huibert BurgerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6484-0349
Marjolein B M MeddensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd M van BelkumDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/03cv38k47University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Brenda W J H PenninxDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcus J M MeddensIndependent Researcher, Deventer, The Netherlands.
Robert A SchoeversDepartment of Psychiatry, https://ror.org/03cv38k47University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0760-9866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious biomarkers have been identified as being associated with the pathophysiology of major depression, with the potential to be utilised within an objective laboratory test for the diagnosis of depression, based on machine learning techniques.

aimsThis study aims to build on previous results by modelling, in a larger and more heterogeneous cohort, the joint diagnostic accuracy of urine and serum-based biomarkers that showed predictive value for depression in our previous work.

methodA novel, multivariable, machine learning-based diagnostic tool for depression was tested on a combination of 34 urine- and serum-based biomarkers among 160 people diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 120 controls, split into 3 different cohorts. Quantile-based prediction was applied to construct a biomarker-based diagnostic model (BDM) yielding a score for each biomarker. The sum score for each participant was used to calculate an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a measure of discriminatory power.

resultsWe demonstrated that the BDM after internal validation had good discriminatory power, with an AUC of 0.81. Further internal-external validation by calculating individual depression probability scores for each separate cohort resulted in an AUC of between 0.62 and 0.72.

conclusionsIn terms of clinical applicability, the present study shows that the combination of biomarkers and a machine learning model can discriminate between MDD and healthy controls with a modest level of diagnostic accuracy. A biomarker test could have potential added value for the future diagnostic toolkit, but this does require further research.

Indexed as

biomarker panelmachine learningMajor depressive disorderquantile-based predictionTRIPOD

Identifiers

PMID42290523
PMCPMC13276772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.