ArticleBJPsych open2026
Feasibility of diagnosing major depressive disorder with a panel of serum and urine biomarkers.
Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious biomarkers have been identified as being associated with the pathophysiology of major depression, with the potential to be utilised within an objective laboratory test for the diagnosis of depression, based on machine learning techniques.
aimsThis study aims to build on previous results by modelling, in a larger and more heterogeneous cohort, the joint diagnostic accuracy of urine and serum-based biomarkers that showed predictive value for depression in our previous work.
methodA novel, multivariable, machine learning-based diagnostic tool for depression was tested on a combination of 34 urine- and serum-based biomarkers among 160 people diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 120 controls, split into 3 different cohorts. Quantile-based prediction was applied to construct a biomarker-based diagnostic model (BDM) yielding a score for each biomarker. The sum score for each participant was used to calculate an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a measure of discriminatory power.
resultsWe demonstrated that the BDM after internal validation had good discriminatory power, with an AUC of 0.81. Further internal-external validation by calculating individual depression probability scores for each separate cohort resulted in an AUC of between 0.62 and 0.72.
conclusionsIn terms of clinical applicability, the present study shows that the combination of biomarkers and a machine learning model can discriminate between MDD and healthy controls with a modest level of diagnostic accuracy. A biomarker test could have potential added value for the future diagnostic toolkit, but this does require further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.