Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42290380›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

Evaluation of a New Paracingulate Sulcus Identification and Measurement Protocol.

Héloïse de Vareilles, Samantha C Mitchell, Jane R Garrison, Shun-Chin Jim Wu, Laura Alvarez-Sanchez, Reuben Thomas, Suveththa Kugan, Atheer Al-Manea, Michail Mamalakis, Lynn Egeland Mørch-Johnsen and 4 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Héloïse de VareillesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7782-9701
Samantha C MitchellDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jane R GarrisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Shun-Chin Jim WuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Laura Alvarez-SanchezDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Reuben ThomasDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Suveththa KuganDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Atheer Al-ManeaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Michail MamalakisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lynn Egeland Mørch-JohnsenNorment, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid AgartzDepartment of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
John SucklingDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jon S SimonsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Graham K MurrayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W020025/1Mental Health Research UKNational Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR203312Rosetrees Trust A1841Rosetrees Trust M864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The folding pattern of the anterior cingulate cortex is variable among individuals. The paracingulate sulcus (PCS), in particular, can be difficult to identify because of this variability. In this paper, we assessed the benefits of a new protocol to identify the PCS and measure its length using 3D reconstructions of the brain obtained through the BrainVISA software. Both the previous state-of-the-art protocol and the new protocol were applied to identify the PCS in subjects from a UK cohort (n = 50), with the length of the PCS computed automatically by BrainVISA after PCS identification. We assessed inter-rater reliability for PCS length under both protocols and the correlation of PCS length values output by the two protocols. Inspection of the results indicated an advantage of the new protocol as there are 8 out of 100 hemispheres in which the old protocol detects a PCS due to the mislabelling of the intra-limbic sulcus as the cingulate sulcus and the new protocol does not. This advantage is conferred by the incorporation of identification of the intra-limbic sulcus (when present) in the new protocol. For instances where the protocols agreed on the presence of a PCS, the new protocol for PCS length obtained intra-class correlations of 0.85 and 0.86 on respectively untrained and trained experimenters, compared to 0.81 when trained experimenters used the previous protocol. The PCS length correlation between both protocols was 0.73 for the entire sample and 0.85 after excluding instances where the protocols disagreed on the presence of a PCS. These findings suggest that taking into account the intra-limbic sulcus and taking advantage of 3D sulcal visualisation may help improve reliable PCS identification, and that the new protocol is a reliable tool that is likely to prove useful in research into cingulate and paracingulate cortical folding.

Indexed as

Brain MappingGyrus CinguliImaging, Three-DimensionalAdultFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42290380
PMCPMC13266417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.