Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42290305›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescence2026

"It's Okay, Everyone Else Is Doing It": Moral Disengagement and Peer Delinquency.

Romain Decrop, Michael McCart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Romain DecropDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3325-9057
Michael McCartDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdolescence is a developmental period during which moral cognition and peer environments change in ways that shape trajectories of antisocial behavior into adulthood. Although moral disengagement (MD) and peer delinquency (PD) are established risk factors for persistent offending, they are typically studied in isolation. The present study investigates the joint development of MD and PD across adolescence and early adulthood, and tests whether changes in one process forecast subsequent changes in the other.

methodsSelf-reported survey data of MD and PD from 1,354 U.S. justice-involved youth (86.41% male; baseline Mage = 16.04; 41.5% Black, 33.5% Hispanic, 20.2% White, 4.8% Other) in the Pathways to Desistance study were analyzed using an autoregressive latent trajectory framework across 11 waves that spanned 7 years from 2000 to 2010.

resultsMD and PD exhibited coordinated long-term declines with aligned slowing over time, such that higher levels in either process were linked to more persistent elevations in the other. At the within-person level, autoregressive continuity varied across development, with stronger short-term persistence during the middle waves and attenuation at earlier and later stages. Similarly, cross-lagged associations were small and wave-specific, emerging only at selected transitions rather than reflecting consistent reciprocal prediction across waves.

conclusionsTogether, these findings demonstrate that moral cognition and peer contexts are dynamically linked across adolescence and adulthood, highlighting the potential value of considering both processes in future work aimed at understanding persistent antisocial trajectories.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorJuvenile DelinquencyMoralsPeer GroupAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesYoung Adultadolescentdevelopmentmoral disengagementpeer delinquencyyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID42290305
PMCPMC13440693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.