Trial reportNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2026
Functional Electrical Stimulation Combined With Reactive Balance Training for Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomised Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIndividuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) have difficulty eliciting reactive steps when balance is lost, increasing fall risk. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) applied to the common fibular nerve elicits a flexor withdrawal response, potentially assisting reactive stepping. Combining reactive balance training with FES (Reactive Balance Training [RBT] + FES) may enhance reactive balance control. This study compared the efficacy of RBT + FES to RBT alone in individuals with chronic, motor iSCI.
methodsTwenty-two individuals (63.9 ± 14.8 years; 3.8 ± 2.8 years post-injury) were randomly assigned to RBT + FES or RBT alone. They completed 18 1-hour training sessions over 6 weeks. Outcome measures were assessed pre-, immediately post- and 6 months post-intervention, and included the behavioural response of the Lean-and-Release test (single-step, 2-step, ≥3-step, or fall) and clinical measures of balance, balance confidence, fall concern, lower limb strength, and proprioception of the ankle. A 2-way mixed analysis of variance assessed group differences over time. Fall incidence was monitored via an online survey for 6 months following training.
resultsSignificant improvements over time were observed for single-step and fall responses during the Lean-and-Release test, and on all clinical outcomes ( DISCUSSION: Both RBT + FES and RBT alone led to significant improvements in reactive stepping ability, balance control, balance confidence, fall concern, and lower limb strength. However, the FES protocol applied in this study did not provide additional benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.