Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42290129›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia and intensive care2026

Large language model prompt engineering for medical education: A practical guide for the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Final Examination.

Timothy J Trewren, Galina Gheihman, Kelly Bratkovic, D-Yin Lin, Stewart Anderson, Dario Winterton, Christina Gao, Brandon Stretton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timothy J TrewrenAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4626-5007
Galina GheihmanHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1599-3271
Kelly BratkovicFlinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia.
D-Yin LinFlinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
Stewart AndersonAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Dario WintertonHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Christina GaoAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Brandon StrettonAdelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can achieve passing scores in specialist-level examinations, yet their capacity to author high-stakes examination content remains under-explored. Compared with published human benchmarks, LLMs create questions roughly 10 times faster, and contextual memory across sessions enables rapid diversification of topic coverage. Prompt design therefore emerges as an academic, not merely technical, craft. This article synthesises the emerging literature on artificial intelligence-assisted item writing and illustrates, through stepwise experimentation with OpenAI GPT-4o, how deliberate prompt engineering can align LLM output with the high standards of medical examinations. Key strategies explored include defining clinical context, imposing structural constraints, supplying exemplar items, assigning examiner roles, sequencing chain-of-thought instructions and requesting rationales. In a worked example, these approaches are layered sequentially while generating short-answer questions mapped to Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists curriculum statements. An evidence-based approach to LLM use for question generation could markedly reduce examiner workload, provide educational integrity and enrich item banks.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyAnesthetistsEducational MeasurementEducation, MedicalLarge Language ModelsAustraliaGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansNew Zealandartificial intelligenceLarge language modelsmedical educationmedical examinationprompt engineeringquestion generation

Identifiers

PMID42290129
PMCPMC13583065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.