ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Enhancing Relative Binding Free Energy Calculation with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo, Water-swap Monte Carlo, Terminal-flip Monte Carlo and Replica Exchange Solute Tempering.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alchemical free energy calculations, particularly free energy perturbation (FEP), have become routine in drug design. When molecular dynamics (MD) is employed as the sampling method in FEP, accurately sampling water molecules deeply buried in protein binding pockets remains challenging, despite their critical role in protein-ligand interactions. We implemented three enhanced sampling methods, Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC), water-swap Monte Carlo (water-swap MC), and replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2). GCMC or water-swap MC accelerates the hydration state equilibration in buried pockets and REST2 accelerates the sampling of ligand conformations. Combining REST2 with GCMC or water-swap MC enables accurate calculation of ligand relative binding free energies. In the benchmark on the water set, our package achieved an RMSE of 0.92 kcal/mol, compared to 0.86 kcal/mol from FEP+ and 1.60 kcal/mol from OpenFE. This development provides the scientific community with an open-source sampling engine for robust and accurate FEP calculations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.