Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42290083›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Enhancing Relative Binding Free Energy Calculation with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo, Water-swap Monte Carlo, Terminal-flip Monte Carlo and Replica Exchange Solute Tempering.

Chenggong Hui, Bert L de Groot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenggong HuiComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2875-4739
Bert L de GrootComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-3534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alchemical free energy calculations, particularly free energy perturbation (FEP), have become routine in drug design. When molecular dynamics (MD) is employed as the sampling method in FEP, accurately sampling water molecules deeply buried in protein binding pockets remains challenging, despite their critical role in protein-ligand interactions. We implemented three enhanced sampling methods, Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC), water-swap Monte Carlo (water-swap MC), and replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2). GCMC or water-swap MC accelerates the hydration state equilibration in buried pockets and REST2 accelerates the sampling of ligand conformations. Combining REST2 with GCMC or water-swap MC enables accurate calculation of ligand relative binding free energies. In the benchmark on the water set, our package achieved an RMSE of 0.92 kcal/mol, compared to 0.86 kcal/mol from FEP+ and 1.60 kcal/mol from OpenFE. This development provides the scientific community with an open-source sampling engine for robust and accurate FEP calculations.

Identifiers

PMID42290083
PMCPMC13374029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.