Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42290036›Full record

ReviewEssays in biochemistry2026

Bacterial-fungal interactions: connections and consequences.

Rebecca A Hall, Katherine J Baxter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca A HallSchool of Natural Sciences, Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4908-8168
Katherine J BaxterPlant Science Group, School of Molecular Biosciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8237-9103

Funding

UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (AFRC)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nature, microorganisms exist in multispecies microbial communities containing bacteria, fungi, archaea, and viruses. The organisation, behaviour, and ecological impact of these communities are very much defined by the various interactions between bacteria and fungi within the community, with physical associations, chemical communication, metabolic exchange, and genetic regulation collectively shaping how these interkingdom communities assemble, adapt, and influence their hosts and habitats. Methods of interaction are widely shared across the microbiota of plants, animals, and the built environment; however, interkingdom microbial communities have environmentally specific outcomes, meaning it is critically important to understand bacterial-fungal interactions (BFIs) within the host or environmental context. With recent advances in BFI analysis now providing increasingly detailed resolution of BFIs and their function in the dialogue between interkingdom microbial communities and their growth environment, we can now gain better insight into these fundamental processes. In the present mini-review, we detail the main BFIs observed in these interkingdom microbial communities, and their implications in the context of plant, human, and the health of the built environment. We also discuss tools and methodologies for their analysis and potential use in the development of microbially derived technologies to improve health and well-being. Finally, we endorse the perspective that interkingdom microbial communities should be considered as structured, interdependent networks with analogy to multicellular organisation.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaFungiMicrobial InteractionsAnimalsHumansMicrobiotaBacterial-fungal interactionsinterkingdom interactionsMicrobial communitiesMicrobial-host interactionsmicrobiology

Identifiers

PMID42290036
PMCPMC13538141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.